Archives
  • 2014 (13)
  • 2013 (22)
  • 2012 (26)
  • 2011 (24)
  • 2010 (24)
  • 2009 (28)
  • 2008 (16)
  • 2007 (17)
  • 2006 (7)
  • 2005 (1)

WILMA TOWNSHIP BOARD OF SUPERVISORS’ MEETING, JUNE 4, 2014

WILMA TOWNSHIP BOARD OF SUPERVISORS’ MEETING,  JUNE 4, 2014

          Chairman Glen Williamson called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. with the Pledge of Allegiance.  Also present, Supervisors Gary Vink and Mike McCullen, Treasurer Patrice Winfield, Clerk Paul Raymond, Road Manager Mark Pallow,  County Commissioner Steve Chaffee, County Forester/Land Commissioner Greg Beck, and Pat Story and Jeff and Jean GrandPre.

OLD BUSINESS:  Wilma Land Sale Resolution:  Steve Chaffee said the County Board understands Wilma Township’s concerns, especially about preserving lands for future generations, but the county Board wants to move forward on selling the non-conservation lands in Wilma Township.  The Board does not intend to sell all the tax-forfeited land in Wilma Township, especially not right away.  They sympathize with our desire to preserve land for all the public, and not just for a private playground.  Steve said he personally does not want to sell all the public lands in Wilma Township.

Greg said the County does not necessarily want to override the township.  By law, they have to notify the affected townships, and the local govt. units have first priority to buy the lands, like Wilma is with our park.  The law was intended to allow towns to have input to deny sales but does not give them 100% veto power.  If the town votes to deny the sale, then there is a public hearing where people can give opinions and input on both sides.  The Commissioners have final say on whether to proceed with the sales.

Greg gave the history of tax-forfeited properties.  The County has 48-50,000 acres of county land. In the past, these were classified as Conservation lands, which the county kept public, and Non-conservation, which they would sell.  They have a third category, Memorial Forest, large tracts that they want to preserve and manage, but may eventually sell.  Out of 48,000 total acres currently, 33,000 acres are Memorial Forest, for timber sales and public use; 3,000 conservation lands, not for sale; and 12,000 Non-conservation, which they want to sell.  They determine Memorial lands by 5 criteria:  1. large acreage; 2. access; 3. public recreation; 4. timber potential; and 5. environmental uniqueness.  If 3 out of 5 apply, the land is Memorial forest, e.g., Crooked Lake land, which would be very high-value land if sold, but would deny the public access, so is Memorial.  Larger blocks in Sections 1 and 2 connect with New Dosey.  Greg said the old board, including Doug Carlson, didn’t want to sell County land, except for smaller 80′s and 40′s, but wanted the County to manage larger tracts.

Glen said that the County has already received money from timber sales. Gary said the access to the land in Sections 6 and 7 show access, but Doody has barricaded the road.  Beck said they told him he has to remove the barricades and can’t lock the gate.  Section 9, north of Glienke’s, is landlocked, and they would force access.

The County wants to sell the 240 acres in Section 11 to recoup the money spent on Schmedeke Lane extension.  The road was built better than a forest road for access to the timber, but also to make the land more attractive for sale.  In Section 18 Dollar Lake Road, 53 acres west of the road; end of Mayfield Road, 140 acres in two separate parcels. They purchased an easement from McHughs.  Section 7, north of Vink Road the  county already paid for access and will build a road if they sell it.  The County has expended $46,000 on these parcels, including the Schmedeke Lane Extension and the easements.

Glen said it sounds like no matter what the township wants, on July 15 the Board will overrule the township.  Glen said he can’t attend, so it’s up to Mike and Gary to appeal the Township’s interests.  Mike said for that $46,000 investment, the County did receive a lot of money for timber sales, and if the county sells all the tax-forfeited lands in Wilma, they will have no more land to manage.  Out of the 12 parcels in Wilma Township, the County wants to sell 8 of them, and they will only have 4 left, and then what, when there is no more land?  We are almost out of public lands, and public lands are more of an asset to the township.  Some of the lakes that used to be public access are now gated up.  Steve said he sympathizes because the same is true in his township; lakes they used to be able to fish are now locked.  Mike asked why they are so determined to sell the land, when they can get another timber harvest in 40-50 years if it is managed for the public?

Greg said he has opinions, but has to act as directed by the Commissioners, and if they tell him to designate lands for Memorial Forest, he will.  Greg said we need to compromise; he has a list of properties the County could revise.  Steve said the township needs to appear to appeal and explain their side, and the Commissioners need to hear how important public lands are to the people of Wilma Township.  Mike said he and Gary will be there.  Pat said they are speaking for him as well.  Mike said if we compromise and one parcel is sold every year, before long there will be no public land left.  Greg said our resolution sounds like Wilma does not want to have any tax-forfeited land sales ever.  He can understand that in larger parcels, but the County sometimes gets small acre lots.  Mike said the board doesn’t have a problem with that.

Township Park:  Glen asked what is the status of our Park; is the county going to give it to the township?  Greg said that because it has public waters, the state legislature has to approve the sale, and the county will convey it to Wilma under conditional use, like the south half of the Park (which the town gets free-and-clear in 2015).  No one knows for sure why the County or Wilma has no proof of the town owning the north 20 acres; they speculate that the process started and then stopped, although the county and everyone has always thought the whole 36.5 acres belonged to Wilma.  The town will have to pay a few hundred dollars for the sale.

Garbage in County Rights-of-Way:  Paul asked about the sofa and garbage dumped along the Duxbury Road by North Duncan Road, and the TV dumped at the end of the Mink Farm Road.  Steve asked if we had contacted Melzark; Paul said we notified the Co. Highway Dept.

McDermott Creek Dropoff:  Glen told Steve and Greg that we notified the Highway Dept. about the steep dropoff on McDermott Creek on the Markville Road, with no markers or barriers.  Greg said they would go check it out, and at least there would be some warning signs put up.

Schmedeke Lane Extension:  Glen asked what exactly is the County asking Eldon to purchase?  Greg said they are offering him 132 feet, but he will only be paying for 62 feet.  He will be buying 8 acres for the price of 4, so the County can retain access.  The deed will be for 8 acres.  If Eldon does not accept this, the county will not give us the road.  The deadline is first Tuesday in August; then the offer will be withdrawn.  If he doesn’t buy it, the county will sell the whole block but will retain the easement with the extension they built, 66′ of road.  They will sell it in 3 blocks.  If he accepts the agreement, Eldon will be getting 8 acres for the price of 4 and the other 4 will not be taxed.  He will have road frontage on a good township road, built up to County specs.

Conclusions:  Glen asked Paul to write a letter to Chaffee about McDermott Creek.  Glen moved that a committee of Mike, Pat, and Jeff draft a position paper on why Wilma Township does not want the County to sell any public lands in Wilma Township before the July 15 hearing, up to two hours at the $15/hour rate.  Paul said our resolution already spells out very clearly our reasons for denying the sales, and he read the relevant portions.  Mike said maybe they can elaborate a little for the Commissioners to understand our position, and he seconded the motion. The committee will present their report at the July 2nd Board meeting, so it can be forwarded to the Commissioners before the July 15 hearing.

May Meeting Record:  Paul read the record of the May meeting. Glen made one correction:  the storm shelter cost $4,600, not $6,000, and with this correction, he moved to approve the report.  Mike seconded.  Patrice asked if Paul will send the report of Ben Glocke as a new hire, and if we have to report all our hires retroactively.  Paul said he will find out and take care of it.

Gravel:  Gary moved that Mark use the township gravel at Alden’s pit and have Hopkins haul it.  Mike seconded.

Summer Short Course:  June 26; Patrice got the form and will send it in for Glen, Gary, Paul and herself. Glen will drive if his truck is fixed.

2015 Assessments:  Mike moved to appoint Bob Brewster as our township assessor for 2015.

Duxbury Store 3.2 Beer license:  Glen moved to approve and sign the application for the Duxbury Store; Mike seconded.  Gary abstained.

Treasurer’s report and Claims:  Patrice gave the Treasurer’s report (attached).  Bills were presented:

Pine Co. Assessor (Special Assessments)             $        367.00

Paul (internet)                                                                  10.00

Mark (expenses)                                                              18.48

Glen (road inspection mileage)                                                  40.88

Patrice (expenses)                                                            19.80

ECE                                                                                 47.43

Mark                                                                                48.48

Gary                                                                              337.54

Antoinette Williamson                                                     13.85

Glen                                                                               192.78

Patrice                                                                              90.50

Federated Propane

Paul                                                                               253.04

Mike                                                                              170.85

Pat Story                                                                       120.00

Total Claims                            $     1,916.59

Gary moved to approve the Treasurer’s report and to pay all the claims and to transfer $1,900 from savings into checking.  Mike seconded.  Mike moved to adjourn the meeting; Gary seconded.  Meeting adjourned at 9:30 p.m.

____________________

Paul Raymond, Clerk

____________________

Glen Williamson, Chair

TOWN OF WILMA SUBSURFACE SEWAGE TREATMENT SYSTEMS

TOWN OF WILMA
SUBSURFACE SEWAGE TREATMENT SYSTEMS

The Board of Supervisors of Wilma Township, Pine County, Minnesota does ordain:

This is an ordinance authorizing and providing for sewage treatment and soil dispersal in unsewered areas of the Township. It establishes:
1. Minimum standards for and regulation of individual sewage treatment systems (ISTS) and mid-sized Subsurface Sewage Treatment Systems (MSTS) (collectively referred to as SSTS) in the Town of Wilma, incorporating by reference minimum standards established by Minnesota statutes and administrative rules of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency.;
2. Requirements for issuing permits for installation, alteration, repair or expansion of SSTS.;
3. Requirements for all SSTS permitted under the revised Minnesota Rules, Chapters 7080 and 7081 to be operated under an approved management plan.;
4. Standards for upgrade, repair, replacement, or abandonment of SSTS.;
5. Penalties for failure to comply with these provisions.;
6. Provisions for enforcement of these requirements.; and
7. Standards which promote the health, safety and welfare of the public as reflected in Minnesota Statutes §103F, §103G, §115.55, §145A.05, §375.51, §394.21-394.37, and §462.353, along with the applicable Minnesota Rules, Pine County Comprehensive Plan, Pine County Shoreland Management Ordinance, Pine County Flood Plain Ordinance, Kettle River Wild and Scenic River Ordinance, and the Pine County Subdivision and Platting Ordinance.

ARTICLE 1. PURPOSE AND INTENT
1.01 Purpose
The purpose of this Ordinance is to establish minimum requirements for regulation of ISTS and MSTS for the treatment and dispersal of sewage within the applicable jurisdiction of the Township, to protect public health and safety, groundwater quality, and prevent or eliminate the development of public nuisances. It is intended to serve the best interests of the Township’s citizens by protecting its health, safety, general welfare, and natural resources.

1.02 Intent
It is intended by the Town of Wilma that this Ordinance will promote the following:

A. The protection of lakes, rivers, streams, wetlands, and groundwater in Wilma Township essential to the promotion of public health, safety, welfare, socioeconomic growth and development of the town.
B. The regulation of proper SSTS construction, reconstruction, repair and maintenance to prevent the entry and migration of contaminants, thereby protecting the degradation of surface water and groundwater quality.
C. The establishment of minimum standards for SSTS placement, design, construction, reconstruction, repair and maintenance to prevent contamination and, if contamination is discovered, the identification and control of its consequences and the abatement of its source and migration.
D. The appropriate utilization of privy vaults and other non-water carried sewage collection and storage facilities.
E. The provision of technical assistance and education, plan review, inspections, SSTS surveys and complaint investigations to prevent and control water-borne diseases, lake degradation, groundwater related hazards, and public nuisance conditions.

1.03 Authority
This Ordinance is adopted pursuant to Minnesota Statutes §115.55, Minnesota Statutes §145A.01 through §145A.08, Minnesota Statutes §375.51, or successor statutes, and Minnesota Rules, Chapter 7081, Chapter 7081, Chapter 7082, or successor rules.

1.04 Effective Date
The provisions set forth in this Ordinance shall become effective on April 1, 2015.

ARTICLE 2. DEFINITIONS
The following words and phrases shall have the meanings ascribed to them in this subdivision. If not specifically defined in this subdivision, terms used in this Ordinance shall have the same meaning as provided in the standards adopted by reference. Words or phrases that are not defined here or in the standards adopted by reference shall have common usage meaning. For purposes of this Ordinance, the words “must” and “shall” are mandatory and the words “may” and “should” are permissive.

Authorized Representative: An employee or agent of the Town of Wilma, including authorized contracted septic designers and inspectors.

Bedroom: A room that is designed or used for sleeping or a room or area of a dwelling that has
a minimum floor area of 70 square feet with access gained from the living area or living area hallway.

Board of Supervisors: Wilma Township’s Board of Supervisors. They have the authority to order the issuance of variances, hear and decide appeals from a member of the affected public and review any order, requirement, decision, or determination made by Wilma Township’s authorized septic inspector, who is charged with septic inspections and permit issuing, pursuant to the provision of Minnesota Statutes §394.21 to §394.37. Our authorized septic inspector shall order the issuance of permits for buildings in areas designated for future public use on an official map and perform such other duties as required by the official controls.

Class V Injection Well: A shallow well used to place a variety of fluids directly below the land surface, which includes a domestic SSTS serving more than 20 people. The US Environmental Protection Agency and delegated state groundwater programs permit these wells to inject wastes below the ground surface provided they meet certain requirements and do not endanger underground sources of drinking water. Class V motor vehicle waste disposal wells and large-capacity cesspools are specifically prohibited (see 40 CFR Parts 144 and 146).

Cluster System: A SSTS under some form of common ownership that collects wastewater from two or more dwellings or buildings and conveys it to a treatment and dispersal system located on an acceptable site near the dwellings or buildings.

County: Pine County, Minnesota.

Design Flow: The daily volume of wastewater for which an SSTS is designed to treat and discharge.

Existing Systems: Systems that have been previously inspected and approved by the local unit
of government during installation. In addition, all operating systems installed before the adoption of a local permitting and inspection program are considered existing systems.

Failure to Protect Groundwater: At a minimum, a SSTS that does not protect groundwater is considered to be a seepage pit, cesspool, drywell, leaching pit, or other pit; a SSTS with less than the required vertical separation distance, described in Minnesota Rules Chapter 7080.1500 Subp. 4D and E; and a system not abandoned in accordance with part 7080.2500. The determination of the threat to groundwater for other conditions must be made by an individual licensed pursuant to Section 4.05 of this Ordinance.

Imminent Threat to Public Health and Safety: At a minimum a SSTS with a discharge of sewage or sewage effluent to the ground surface, drainage systems, ditches, or storm water drains or directly to surface water; SSTS that cause a reoccurring sewage backup into a dwelling or other establishment; SSTS with electrical hazards; or sewage tanks with unsecured, damaged, or weak maintenance access covers. The determination of protectiveness for other conditions must be made by a Qualified Employee or a SSTS inspection business licensed pursuant to Section 4.05 of this Ordinance.

ISTS: An individual sewage treatment system having a design flow of no more than 5,000 gallons per day.

Lot: A parcel of land in a plat recorded in the office of the county recorder or registrar of title or a parcel of land created and conveyed, using a specific legal description, for a building site to be served by an ISTS.

Malfunction: The partial or complete loss of function of a SSTS component, which requires a corrective action to restore its intended function.

Management Plan: A plan that describes necessary and recommended routine operational and maintenance requirements, periodic examination, adjustment and testing, and the frequency of each to ensure system performance meets the treatment expectations, including a planned course of action to prevent an illegal discharge.

Minor Repair: The repair or replacement of an existing damaged or faulty component/part of an SSTS that will return the SSTS to its operable condition. The repair shall not alter the original area, dimensions, design, specifications or concept of the SSTS.

MSTS: A “midsized subsurface sewage treatment system” under single ownership that receives sewage from dwellings or other establishments having a design flow of more than 5,000 gallons per day to a maximum of 10,000 gallons per day.

New Construction: Installing or constructing a new ISTS or altering, extending, or adding capacity to a system that has been issued an initial certificate of compliance.

Notice of Noncompliance: A written document issued by the Board of Supervisors or certified inspection business notifying a system owner that the owner’s onsite/cluster treatment system has been observed to be non-compliant with the requirements of this Ordinance.

MPCA: Minnesota Pollution Control Agency.

Qualified Contractor: A contractor of the township who performs site evaluations or designs, installs, maintains, pumps, or inspects SSTS as part of their duties and is registered on the SSTS professional register verifying specialty area endorsements applicable to the work being conducted as defined in Minnesota Rule 7083.1010.

Periodically saturated soil: The highest elevation in the soil that is in a reduced chemical state due to soil pores filled or nearly filled with water causing anaerobic conditions. Periodically saturated soil is determined by the presence of redoximorphic features in conjunction with other established indicators as specified in part 7080.1720, subpart 5, items E and F, or as determined by other scientifically established technical methods or empirical field measurements acceptable to the permitting authority in consultation with the board.

Privy: An above ground structure with an underground cavity meeting the requirements of part 7080.2280 that is used for the storage or treatment and dispersal of toilet wastes, excluding water for flushing or graywater.

Record Drawings: A set of drawings, which to the fullest extent possible, document the final in-place location, size and type of all SSTS components, including the results of any materials testing performed and a description of conditions during construction of the system.

Redoximorphic features: A color pattern in soil, formed by oxidation and reduction of iron or manganese in saturated soil couple with their removal, translocation or accrual, which results in the loss (depletion) or gain (concentration) of mineral compounds compared to the matrix color or a soil matrix color controlled by the presence of ferrous iron. Also described in part 7080.1720 subpart 5 item E.

Sewage: Waste from toilets, bathing, laundry or culinary activities or operations or floor drains associated with these sources, including household cleaners and other constituents in amounts normally used for domestic purposes.

SSTS: Subsurface sewage treatment system including an ISTS, MSTS or LSTS

State: The State of Minnesota.

Subdivision: The division of a parcel of land into two or more lots or parcels for the purpose of transfer of ownership.

Treatment Level: Treatment system performance levels defined in Minnesota Rules, Chapter 7083.4030, Table III for testing of proprietary treatment products, which include the following:
Level A: cBOD5≤15 mg/L; TSS≤15 mg/L; fecal coliforms≤1,000/100 mL.
Level B: cBOD5≤25 mg/L; TSS≤30 mg/L; fecal coliforms≤10,000/100 mL.
Level C: cBOD5≤125 mg/L; TSS≤60 mg/L; fecal coliforms N/A.

Type I System: An ISTS that follows a standard trench, bed, at-grade, mound, or graywater system design in accordance with MPCA rules, Minnesota Rules, Chapter 7080.2200 through 7080.2240.

Type II System: An ISTS with acceptable modifications or sewage containing containment system that may be permitted for use on a site not meeting the conditions acceptable for a standard Type I system. These include systems on lots with rapidly permeable soils or lots in floodplains and privies or holding tanks.

Type III System: A custom designed ISTS having acceptable flow restriction devices to allow its use on a lot that cannot accommodate a standard Type I soil treatment and dispersal system.

Type IV System: An ISTS, having an approved pretreatment device and incorporating pressure distribution and dosing, that is capable of providing suitable treatment for use where the separation distance to a shallow saturated zone is less than the minimum allowed.

Type V System: An ISTS, which is a custom engineered design to accommodate the site taking into account pretreatment effluent quality, loading rates, loading methods, groundwater mounding, and other soil and other relevant soil, site and wastewater characteristics such that groundwater contamination by viable fecal coliforms is prevented.

ARTICLE 3. GENERAL PROVISIONS
3.01 Scope
This Ordinance regulates the siting, design, installation, alterations, operation, maintenance, monitoring, and management of all SSTS within the Township’s applicable jurisdiction including, but not necessarily limited to individual SSTS and cluster or community SSTS, privy vaults, and other non-water carried SSTS. All sewage generated in unsewered areas of the Township shall be treated and dispersed by an approved SSTS that is sited, designed, installed, operated and maintained in accordance with the provisions of this Ordinance or by a system that has been permitted by the MPCA.

3.02 Jurisdiction
The jurisdiction of this Ordinance shall include all lands of the Township. The Pine County Land Services Department shall keep a current list of local jurisdictions within the County, including Wilma Township, who are administering a SSTS program.
3.03 Administration

3.03.01 Township Administration. The Wilma Township Board of Supervisors shall administer the SSTS program and all provisions of this Ordinance. At appropriate times, the Town Board shall review this and revise and update this Ordinance as necessary. The Township shall retain under contract qualified and appropriately licensed professionals to administer and operate the SSTS program.

3.03.02 State of Minnesota. Where a single SSTS or group of SSTS under single ownership within one-half mile of each other, have a design flow greater than 10,000 gallons per day, the owner or owners shall make application for and obtain a State Disposal System permit from MPCA. For any SSTS that has measured daily flow for a consecutive seven-day period which equals or exceeds 10,000 gallons per day, a State Disposal System permit is required. SSTS serving establishments or facilities licensed or otherwise regulated by the State shall conform to the requirements of this Ordinance.

3.03.03 Pine County Shoreland Ordinance Jurisdiction:

Wilma Township will allow Pine County to administer the SSTS program within shoreland areas of Wilma Township, under the County’s Shoreland Ordinance approved by the Commissioners of Minnesota Natural Resources. Shorelands are areas within 300′ of rivers/creeks, and 1,000 feet of lakes. See also Sections 4.02.02 and 8.01.01Aii.

3.04 Validity
The validity of any part of this Ordinance shall not be affected by the invalidity of any other parts of this Ordinance where the part can be given effect irrespective of any invalid part or parts.

3.05 Liability
No liability or responsibility shall be imposed upon the Townhip or agency or any of its officials, employees, or other contract agent, its employees, agents or servants thereof for damage resulting from the construction, operation, or abandonment of any SSTS regulated under this rule by reason of standards, requirements or inspections authorized hereunder.

ARTICLE 4. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
4.01 Retroactivity

4.01.01 All SSTS
Except as explicitly set forth in Subdivision 4.01.02, all provisions of this Ordinance shall apply to any SSTS regardless of the date it was originally installed.
4.01.02 Existing Permits
Unexpired permits which were issued prior to the effective date shall remain valid under the terms and conditions of the original permit until the original expiration date.

4.01.03 SSTS on Lots Created After January 23, 1996
All lots created after January 23, 1996 must have a minimum of two soil treatment and dispersal areas that can support trenches, seepage beds, mounds, and at-grade systems as described in Minnesota Rules, Chapters 7080.2200 through 7080.2230 or site conditions described in 7081.0270, Subp.3 through 7 at the time the plat or subdivision is approved.

A cluster SSTS that have a common interest lot where a central system is located shall meet this requirement by having the minimum of two soil treatment and dispersal areas on the designated lot.

4.02 Upgrade, Repair, and Replacement

4.02.01 SSTS Capacity Expansions
Expansion of an existing SSTS must include any system upgrades that are necessary to bring the entire system into compliance with the prevailing provisions of this Ordinance at the time of the expansion.

4.02.02 Shorelands
An SSTS not meeting or exceeding the requirements Minnesota Rules Chapters 7080 and 7081 as adopted by reference in Section 5.01 of this Ordinance must be upgraded, at a minimum, prior to recording any property title transfers or contracts for deed beginning January 1, 1994 or at any time a permit or variance of any type is required for any improvement on, or use of, the property within the shoreland areas of the county.

4.02.03 Failure to Protect Groundwater
An SSTS that is determined not to be protective of groundwater in accordance with Minnesota Rules, Chapter 7080.1500, Subp. 4.B shall be upgraded, repaired, replaced or abandoned by the owner in accordance with the provisions of this Ordinance within 18 months of receipt of a Notice of Noncompliance.

4.02.04 Imminent Threat to Public Health or Safety
An SSTS that is determined to be an imminent threat to public health or safety in accordance with Minnesota Rules, Chapter 7080.1500, Subp. 4A shall be upgraded, repaired, replaced or abandoned by the owner in accordance with the provisions of this Ordinance within 10 months of receipt of a Notice of Noncompliance.

4.03 SSTS In Floodplains
SSTS shall not be located in a floodway and wherever possible, location within any part of a floodplain shall be avoided. If no option exists to locate a SSTS outside of a floodplain, location within the flood fringe is allowed if the requirements in Minnesota Rules, Chapter 7080.2270 and all local requirements are met.

4.04 Class V Injection Wells
All owners of new or replacement SSTS that are considered to be Class V injection wells, as defined in the Code of Federal Regulations, title 40, part 144, are required by the Federal Government to submit SSTS inventory information to the Environmental Protection Agency as described in CFR40 part 144. Further, owners are required to identify all Class V injection wells in property transfer disclosures.

4.05 SSTS Practitioner Licensing
No person shall engage in site evaluation, inspection, design, installation, construction, alteration, extension, repair, maintenance or pumping of SSTS without an appropriate and valid license issued by MPCA in accordance with Minnesota Rules, Chapter 7083 except as exempted in 7083.0700 Subp. A-I.

4.06 Prohibitions

4.06.01 Occupancy or Use of a Building Without a Compliant SSTS
It is unlawful for any person to maintain, occupy, or use any building with indoor plumbing intended for habitation unless it has a wastewater treatment system that disposes of wastewater in a manner that complies with the provisions of this Ordinance.

4.06.02 Sewage Discharge to Ground Surface or Surface Water
It is unlawful for any person to construct, maintain, or use any SSTS system regulated under this Ordinance that results in raw or partially treated wastewater seeping to the ground surface or flowing into any surface water. Any surface discharging system must be permitted under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System program by the MPCA.

4.06.03 Sewage Discharge to a Well or Boring
It is unlawful for any person to discharge raw or treated wastewater into any well or boring as described in Minnesota Rules, Chapter 4725.2050, or any other excavation in the ground that is not in compliance with this Ordinance.

4.06.04 Discharge of Hazardous or Deleterious Materials
It is unlawful for any person to discharge into any treatment system regulated under this Ordinance any hazardous or deleterious material that adversely affects the treatment or dispersal performance of the system or groundwater quality.

ARTICLE 5. SSTS STANDARDS
5.01 Standards Adopted by Reference
The Township hereby adopts by reference the 2011 Minnesota Rules, Chapters 7080 and 7081 in their entirety as now constituted and from time to time amended. This adoption does not supersede the Township’s right or ability to adopt local standards that are in compliance with Minnesota Statute §115.55 and applicable Minnesota rules within the Department of Natural Resources Chapter 6120. This Ordinance shall also include standards described in the Pine County Shoreland Management Ordinance, Pine County Flood Plain Ordinance, Kettle River Wild and Scenic River Ordinance, and Pine County Subdivision and Platting Ordinance or in the rules in applicable Chapters are also adopted by reference.

5.02 Amendments to the Adopted Standards

5.02.01 List of Adopted Standards
a. Design flow determination for dwellings will be designed for class 1 buildings
only. The design flow for bedrooms is determined by multiplying 150 gallons by the number of bedrooms.

5.02.02 Determination of Hydraulic Loading Rate and SSTS Sizing
Table IX “Loading Rates for Determining Bottom Absorption area for Trenches and Seepage Beds for Effluent Treatment Level C and Absorption Ratios for Determining Mound Absorption Areas Using Detail Soil Descriptions” and Table IXa entitled “Loading Rates for Determining Bottom Absorption Area for Trenches and Seepage Beds for Effluent Treatment Level C and Absorption Ratios for Determining Mound Absorption Areas Using Percolation Tests” from Minnesota Rules, Chapter 7080.2150, Subp. 3(E) are herein adopted by reference and either shall be used to size SSTS infiltration areas for SSTS design.

5.02.03 Compliance Criteria for Existing SSTS
SSTS built before April 1, 1996 that is not located in Shoreland area, wellhead protection area, or is not a commercial establishment where food, beverage, or lodging are served or provided, must have at least two feet of vertical separation between the bottom of the dispersal system and seasonal saturation or bedrock.

SSTS built after March 31, 1996 or SSTS located in a Shoreland area, wellhead Protection area, or serving a food, beverage, or lodging establishment as defined under 7080.1100, Subp. 84 shall have a three-foot vertical separation between the bottom soil infiltrative surface and the periodically saturated soil and/or bedrock. Existing systems that have no more than a 15 percent reduction in this separation distance (a separation distance no less than 30.6 inches) to account for settling of sand or soil, normal variation of separation distance measurements and interpretation of limiting layer characteristics may be considered compliant under this Ordinance. The vertical separation measurement shall be made outside the area of system influence but in an area of similar soil. 7080.1500, Subp. 4.

5.02.04 Holding Tanks
A. Holding tanks may be allowed any of the following applications:
i. for legal lots of record where it can be shown conclusively that a Type I SSTS permitted under this Ordinance cannot be feasibly installed;
ii. where there is limited water use such as seasonal properties, sensitive sites, parks, playgrounds, etc;
iii. as temporary disposal method to alleviate an imminent threat to public health or during construction, repair, or replacement of new and existing systems.

B. Holding tanks must be used under the following conditions:
i. The owner shall install a holding tank in accordance with Minnesota Rules Section 7080.2290;
ii. The owner shall install a water meter to continuously record indoor water use;
iii. The owner shall maintain a valid contract with a licensed maintainer to pump and dispose of septage according to the applicable standards in Code of Federal Regulations, title 40, part 503; and
iv. The owner must maintain current and historical records of maintainer pumping; volume of liquid removed; and the water meter reading at the time of pumping; all for Department review upon request. Volumes removed shall coincide with metered water use readings.

5.02.05 Privies
Privies are permitted provided they meet vertical separation and/or vault guidelines depicted in MN State Rules 7080.2150 and 7080.2280.

5.03 Variances

5.03.01 Variances Requests
A property owner may request a variance from the standards as specified in this Ordinance pursuant to Wilma Township policies and procedures.

5.03.02 Affected Agency
Variances that pertain to the standards and requirements of the State of Minnesota must be approved by the affected State Agency pursuant to the requirements of the State Agency.

5.03.03 Board of Adjustment
A. Any property owner requesting relief from the strict application of the provisions in this Ordinance must complete and submit an Application for Variance to the Board. The variance request must include, as applicable:
i. A statement identifying the specific provision or provisions in the ordinance from which the variance is requested;
ii. A description of the hardship that prevents compliance with the rule;
iii. The alternative measures that will be taken to achieve a comparable degree of compliance with the purposes and intent of the applicable provisions;
iv. The length of time for which the variance is requested;
v. Cost considerations only if a reasonable use of the property does not exist under the term of the ordinance; and
vi. Other relevant information requested by the Board as necessary to properly evaluate the variance requested.
B. The appropriate fee shall be paid at the time of submittal of the application to receive consideration by the Board of Supervisors and/or inspector.
C. Upon receipt of the variance application, the Board shall decide if a site investigation conducted by the Board will be necessary. After the necessary information has been gathered, the Board shall make a written recommendation to approve or deny the variance.
D. The Board shall make the final decision after conducting a public hearing. The variance may be granted provided that:
i. The condition causing the demonstrated hardship is unique to the property and was not caused by the actions of applicant;
ii. The granting of the variance will not be contrary to the public interest or damaging to the rights of other persons or to property values in the vicinity;
iii. The property owner would have no reasonable use of the land without the variance;
iv. The granting of the variance would not allow a prohibited use; and
v. The granting of the variance would be in accordance with Minnesota Rules, Chapters 7080, 7081, and 7082.
E. In granting a request for a variance, the Board may attach such conditions as it deems necessary to conform to the purpose and intent of this Ordinance.
F. Any violation of the terms and conditions of a variance issued pursuant to this Ordinance, or any violation of any provision of this Ordinance relating to the specific issue of the variance, shall result in immediate revocation of the variance.
G. Any variance granted shall automatically expire if the system is not installed within one year of the grant of the variance.
H. Any appeal from any order, requirement, decision, or determination of the Board in accordance with its policies and procedures.

ARTICLE 6. SSTS PERMITTING
6.01 Permit Required
It is unlawful for any person to construct, install, modify or replace a SSTS without the appropriate permit from the authorized inspector of Wilma Township. The issuing of any permit, variance, or conditional use under the provisions of this Ordinance shall not absolve the applicant of responsibility to obtain any other required permit.

6.02 Construction Permit
A construction permit must be obtained by the property owner or an agent of the property owner from the authorized septic inspector prior to the installation, construction, replacement, modification, alteration, repair, or capacity expansion of a SSTS. The purpose of this permit is to ensure that the proposed construction activity is sited, designed, and constructed in accordance with the provisions of this Ordinance by appropriately certified and/or licensed practitioner(s).

6.02.01 Activities Requiring a Construction Permit
A construction permit from the authorized Township septic inspector is required for installation of a new SSTS, for replacement of an existing SSTS, or for any repair or replacement of components that will alter the original function of the system, change the treatment capacity of the system, change the location of the system, or otherwise change the original system’s design, layout, or function.

6.02.02 Activities Not Requiring a Permit
A construction permit is not required for minor repairs or replacements of system components that do not alter the original function of the system, change the treatment capacity of the system, change the location of the system, or otherwise change the original system’s design, layout or function.
6.02.04 Permit Application Requirements
Construction permit applications shall be made on forms provided by the Wilma Township septic inspector and signed by the applicant and an appropriately certified practitioner including the practitioner’s certification number and date of expiration. The applications shall include the documents listed in items A through E below.

A. Name, mailing address, telephone number and email address.
B. Property identification number and address or other description of property location.
C. Site evaluation report as described in Minnesota Rules, Chapter 7080.1730.
D. Design report as described in Minnesota Rules, Chapter 7080.2430.
E. Management plan as described in Minnesota Rules, Chapter 7082.0600.

6.02.05 Application review and Response
The Board’s authorized inspector shall review a permit application and supporting documents. Upon satisfaction that the proposed work will conform to the provisions of this Ordinance, the inspector shall issue a written permit authorizing construction of the SSTS as designed. In the event the applicant makes a significant change to the approved application, the applicant must file an amended application detailing the changed conditions for approval prior to initiating or continuing construction, modification, or operation for approval or denial. The inspector shall complete the review of the amended application within 15 working days of receipt of the amended application. If the permit application is incomplete or does not meet the requirements of this Ordinance, the Board’s inspector shall deny the application. A notice of denial shall be provided to the applicant, which must state the reason for the denial.

6.02.06 Appeal
The applicant may appeal the inspector’s decision to deny the construction permit in accordance with the Township’s established policies and appeal procedures.

6.02.07 Permit Expiration
The construction permit is valid for a period of no more than one year from its date of issue. Satisfactory completion of construction shall be determined by receipt of final record drawings and a signed certification that the construction or installation of the system was completed in reasonable conformance with the design documents as approved by a licensed inspection business, which is authorized by the Board and independent of the owner and the SSTS installer.

6.02.08 Extensions and Renewals
The Board’s authorized septic inspector may grant an extension of the Construction Permit if the construction has commenced prior to the original expiration date of the permit. The permit may be extended for a period of no more than 12 months.

6.02.09 Transferability
A construction permit may be transferred to a new owner provided the new owner follows the design and permit as it has been issued and the site and soil conditions have not been altered or otherwise damaged.

6.02.10 Suspension or Revocation
The Board and its authorized septic inspector may suspend or revoke a construction permit issued under this section for any false statements, misrepresentations of facts on which the construction permit was issued, or unauthorized changes to the system design that alter the original function of the system, change the treatment capacity of the system, change the location of the system, or otherwise change the original system’s design, layout or function. A notice of suspension or revocation and the reasons for the suspension or revocation shall be conveyed in writing to the permit holder. If suspended or revoked, installation or modification of a treatment system may not commence or continue until a valid construction permit is obtained.

6.02.11 Posting
The construction permit shall be posted on the property in such a location and manner so that the permit is visible and available for inspection until construction is completed and certified.

6.03 Operating Permit

6.03.01 SSTS Requiring an Operating Permit
An operating permit shall be required of all owners of Type IV, V, MSTS or any other system deemed by the Board to require operational oversight. Sewage shall not be discharged to a MSTS until the Board certifies that the MSTS was installed in substantial conformance with the approved plans, receives the final record drawings of the MSTS, and a valid operating permit issued to the owner.

6.03.02 Operating Permit Application Requirements
A. Application for an operating permit shall be made on a form provided by the authorized Township septic inspector including:
i. Owner name, mailing address, telephone and email address;
ii. Construction permit reference number and date of issue;
iii. Final record drawings of the treatment system; and
iv. Owners of holding tanks must submit a copy of a valid executed monitoring and disposal contract with a licensed maintenance business.
B. Monitoring and Disposal Contract
Owners of holding tanks shall provide to the inspector or the Board a copy of a valid monitoring and disposal contract executed between the owner and a licensed maintenance business, which guarantees the removal of the holding tank contents in a timely manner that prevents an illegal discharge in accordance with Minnesota Rules, Chapter 7082.0100, Subp. 3G. This requirement is waived if the owner is a farmer who is exempt from licensing under Minnesota Statutes §115.56, Subd. 2(b)(3).

6.03.03 Board of Supervisors’ Response
The Board or its authorized inspector shall review the record drawings, operation and maintenance manual, management plan, maintenance and servicing contract, and any other pertinent documents as appropriate for accuracy and completeness. If any deficiencies are identified, the operating permit shall be denied until the deficiencies are corrected to the satisfaction of the Board or inspector. If the submitted documents fulfill the requirements, the inspector shall issue an operating permit within 10 working days of receipt of the permit application.

6.03.04 Operating Permit Terms and Conditions
The operating permit shall include the following (see Minnesota Rules, Chapter 7082.0600, Subp. 2B):

A. System performance requirements;
B. System operating requirements;
C. Monitoring locations, procedures and recording requirements;
D. Maintenance requirements and schedules;
E. Compliance limits and boundaries;
F. Reporting requirements;
G. Department notification requirements for non-compliant conditions;
H. Valid contract between the owner and a licensed maintenance business;
I. Disclosure, location and condition of acceptable soil treatment and dispersal system site; and
J. Descriptions of acceptable and prohibited discharges.

6.03.05 Operating Permit Expiration and Renewal
A. Operating permits shall be valid for the specific term stated on the permit as determined by the Board.
B. An operating permit must be renewed prior to its expiration. If not renewed, the Board may require the system to be removed from service or operated as a holding tank until the permit is renewed. If not renewed within 90 calendar days of the expiration date, the Township may require that the system be abandoned in accordance with Minnesota Rule 7080.2500.
C. The Board shall notify the holder of an operating permit at least 90 calendar days prior to expiration of the permit. The Owner must apply for renewal at least 30 calendar days before the expiration date.
D. Application shall be made on a form provided by the Board or its authorized septic inspector, including:
i. Applicant name, mailing address and phone number;
ii. Reference number of previous owner’s operating permit;
iii. Any and all outstanding Compliance Monitoring Reports as required by the operating permit;
iv. Certified treatment system inspection signed and/or sealed by a certified designer, maintenance contractor, or operator at the discretion of the Township;
v. Any revisions made to the operation and maintenance manual; and
vi. Payment of application review fee as determined by the Township.

6.03.06 Amendments to Existing Permits not Allowed
The Township may not amend an existing permit to reflect changes in this Ordinance until the permit term has expired and is renewed, unless an amendment is necessary to eliminate an imminent threat to public health or safety.

6.03.07 Transfers
The operating permit may be transferred. The new owner shall notify the department of their ownership within 60 days of the sale of a property operated under an operating permit.

6.03.08 Suspension or Revocation
A. The Board or its authorized septic inspector may suspend or revoke any operating permit issued under this section for any false statements or misrepresentations of facts on which the operating permit was issued.
B. Notice of suspension revocation and the reasons for revocation shall be conveyed in writing to the owner.
C. If suspended or revoked, the Board may require that the treatment system be removed from service, operated as a holding tank, or abandoned in accordance with Article 4.
D. At the Board’s discretion, the operating permit may be reinstated or renewed upon the owner taking appropriate corrective actions.

6.03.09 Compliance Monitoring
A. Performance monitoring of a SSTS shall be performed by a licensed inspection business or licensed service provider hired by the holder of the operating permit in accordance with the monitoring frequency and parameters stipulated in the permit.
B. A monitoring report shall be prepared and certified by the licensed inspection business or licensed service provider. The report shall be submitted to the Board on a form provided by the Board on or before the compliance reporting date stipulated in the operating permit. The report shall contain a description of all maintenance and serving activities performed since the last compliance monitoring report as described below:
i. Owner name and address;
ii. Operating permit number;
iii. Average daily flow since last compliance monitoring report;
iv. Description of type of maintenance and date performed;
v. Description of samples taken (if required), analytical laboratory used, and results of analyses;
vi. Problems noted with the system and actions proposed or taken to correct them; and
vii. Name, signature, license and license number of the licensed professional who performed the work.

6.04 Abandonment Certification

6.04.01 Purpose
The purpose of the System Abandonment Certification is to ensure that a treatment system with no future intent for use be abandoned within a reasonable time following decommissioning and in a manner that protects public health, safety and water qualify. It also terminates all permits associated with the system.

6.04.02 Abandonment Requirements
A. Whenever the use of a SSTS or any system component is discontinued with no future intent of use as the result of a system repair, modification, replacement or decommissioning following connection to a municipal or private sanitary sewer, or condemnation or demolition of a building served by the system, further use of the system or any system component for any purpose under this Ordinance shall be prohibited.
B. An owner of an SSTS must retain a licensed installation business to abandon all components of the treatment system within 60 calendar days of a system. Abandonment shall be completed in accordance with Minnesota Rules, Chapter 7080.2500. No prior notification of the Board of Supervisors of an owner’s intent to abandon a system is necessary.
C. A report of abandonment certified by the licensed installation business shall be submitted to the Board. The report shall include:
i. Owner’s name and contact information;
ii. Property address;
iii. System construction permit and operating permit;
iv. The reason(s) for abandonment; and
v. A brief description of the abandonment methods used, description of the system components removed or abandoned in place, and disposition of any materials or residuals.

6.04.03 Abandonment Certificate
Upon receipt of an abandonment report and its determination that the SSTS has been abandoned according to the requirements of this Ordinance, the Board shall issue an abandonment certificate. If the abandonment is not completed according to the requirements of this Ordinance, the Township shall notify the owner of the SSTS of the deficiencies, which shall be corrected within 30 calendar days of the notice.

ARTICLE 7. MANAGEMENT PLANS
7.01 SSTS Requiring Management Plans
Management plans are required for all new or replacement SSTS. The management plan shall be submitted to the Board’s authorized septic inspector with the construction permit application for review and approval. The Board’s authorized septic inspector shall be notified of any system modifications made during construction and the management plan revised and resubmitted at the time of final construction certification.

7.02 Required Contents of a Management Plan
Management plans shall include (Minnesota Rules, Chapter 7082.0600, Subp. 1):
A. Operating requirements describing tasks that the owner can perform and tasks that a licensed service provider or maintainer must perform;
B. Monitoring requirements;
C. Maintenance requirements including maintenance procedures and a schedule for routine maintenance;
D. Statement that the owner is required to notify the Board’s authorized septic inspector when the management plan requirements are not being met;
E. Disclosure of the location and condition of the additional soil treatment and dispersal area on the owner’s property or a property serving the owner’s residence; and
F. Other requirements as determined by the Board.

7.03 Requirements for Systems not Operated under a Management Plan
Minnesota Rules Chapter 7082.0100, Subp. 3(L) requires SSTS that are not operated under a management plan or operating permit should have treatment tanks inspected and provide for the removal of solids if needed every three years. Solids must be removed when their accumulation meets the limit described in Minnesota Rules, Chapter 7080.2450.

ARTICLE 8. COMPLIANCE MANAGEMENT
8.01 Compliance Inspection Program

8.01.01 Board of Supervisors’ Responsibility
It is the responsibility of the Board, through its authorized agent, to perform various SSTS compliance inspections as necessary or required.
A. SSTS compliance inspections must be performed:
i. To ensure compliance with applicable requirements.
ii. Whenever a permit or variance of any type is required for an improvement on, or use of, the property in shoreland areas of the township as defined in the Pine County Shoreland Management Ordinance. Wilma Township and its authorized septic inspector will operate under the direction and approval and jurisdiction of the County under it’s Shoreland Ordinance in shorelands, within 300′ of creeks/rivers; 1,000 feet from lakes.
iii. For all new SSTS construction or replacement.
iv. Prior to the sale of a property which is required to be serviced by a SSTS.
v. For an evaluation, inspection, recommendation, or other process used to prepare a disclosure statement if conducted by a party who is not the SSTS owner. Such an inspection constitutes a compliance inspection and shall be conducted in accordance with Minnesota Rules, Chapter 7082.0700 using the SSTS inspection report forms provided by MPCA.
B. All compliance inspections must be performed and signed by licensed inspection businesses or qualified employees certified as inspectors.

8.01.02 New Construction or Replacement
A. Compliance inspections must be performed on new or replacement SSTS to determine compliance with Minnesota Rules, Chapters 7080 or 7081.
B. It is the responsibility of the SSTS owner or the owner’s agent to notify the Board two calendar days prior to any permitted work on the SSTS.
C. A certificate of compliance for new SSTS construction or replacement, which shall be valid for five years, shall be issued by the Board or its authorized septic inspector if they have reasonable assurance that the system was built in accordance with the applicable requirements as specified in the construction permit.
D. The certificate of compliance must include a certified statement by the certified inspector who conducted the inspection that the SSTS is or is not in compliance with the ordinance requirements. If the SSTS is determined not to be in compliance with the applicable requirements, a notice of noncompliance must be issued to the owner which includes a statement specifying those ordinance provisions with which the SSTS does not comply.
E. The certificate of compliance or notice of noncompliance must be submitted to the Board through its authorized septic inspector no later than 15 calendar days after the date the inspection was performed. The Board or its authorized septic inspector shall deliver the certificate of compliance or notice of noncompliance to the owner or the owner’s agent within 15 calendar days of receipt from the certified inspector. No SSTS shall be placed into operation until a valid certificate of compliance has been issued.
F. Certificates of compliance for new construction or replacement shall remain valid for five years from the date of issue unless the Board finds evidence of noncompliance.
G. SSTS that are managed by an operating permit must be maintained, monitored or otherwise managed according to the operating permit. SSTS found to be noncompliant with other applicable requirements must be repaired or replaced according to the Board’s requirements.

8.01.03 Existing Systems
A. Compliance inspections shall be required when any of the following conditions occur:
i. When a construction permit is required to repair, modify, or upgrade an existing system.
ii. Any time there is a change in use of the property being served by an existing SSTS which may impact the performance of the system.
iii. At the time of property sale or transfer (see 8.01.04).
iv. At any time an increase in the number of bedrooms of a dwelling which requires a permit from the city or township.
v. Any permit or variance application within the shoreland.
vi. When an operating permit is to be renewed.
vii. At any time as required by this Ordinance or the Board deems appropriate such as upon receipt of a complaint or other notice of a system malfunction.
B. Compliance inspections of existing SSTS shall be reported on the inspection report forms provided by MPCA. The following conditions must be assessed or verified:
i. Watertightness assessment of all treatment tanks including a leakage report;
ii. Vertical separation distance between the bottom of the soil treatment and dispersal system and the periodically saturated soil or bedrock including a vertical separation verification report; and
iii. Sewage backup, surface seepage, or surface discharge.
C. The certificate of compliance must include a certified statement by a licensed inspection business, indicating whether the SSTS is in compliance with the ordinance requirements. If the SSTS is determined not to be in compliance with the applicable requirements, a notice of noncompliance must include a statement specifying those ordinance provisions with which the SSTS does not comply. A construction permit application must be submitted to the inspector or the Board if the required corrective action is not a minor repair.
D. The certificate of compliance or notice of noncompliance must be submitted to the inspector or the board no later than 15 calendar days after the date the inspection was performed. The board or inspector shall deliver the certificate of compliance or notice of noncompliance to the owner or the other’s agent within 15 calendar days of receipt from the licensed inspection business.
E. Certificates of compliance for existing SSTS shall remain valid for three years from the date of issue unless the board finds evidence of noncompliance.

8.01.04 Transfer of Properties
A. Whenever a conveyance of land upon which a dwelling is located, or a tract of land upon which a dwelling is located, or a tract of land upon which a structure that is required to have an SSTS occurs, the following requirements shall be met:
i. A compliance inspection has been performed and a certificate of compliance has been issued and on file with the Board within three years for SSTS older than five years or within five years if the system is less than five years old prior to the intended sale or transfer of the property, unless evidence is found identifying an imminent threat to public health or safety;
ii. The compliance inspection must have been performed by a licensed inspection business following procedures described in Section 8.01.03 of this Ordinance;
iii. The seller of the property must disclose in writing information about the status and location of all known ISTS on the property to the buyer on a form acceptable to the inspector or the Board.
iv. If the seller fails to provide a certificate of compliance, sufficient security in the form of an escrow agreement to assure the installation of a complying ISTS shall be established. The security shall be placed in an escrow with a licensed real estate closer, licensed attorney-at-law, or federal or state chartered financial institution. The amount escrowed shall be equal to 150% of a written estimate to install a complying ISTS provided by a licensed and certified installer, or the amount escrowed shall be equal to 110% of the written contract price for the installation of a complying ISTS provided by a licensed and certified installer. After a complying SSTS has been installed and a certificate of compliance issued, the Borad shall provide the escrow agent a copy of the certificate of compliance.
v. In absence of the escrow account according to Section 8.01.04, Subp. A(iv) above, the buyer shall be responsible for the necessary inspection and upgrading of said SSTS.
B. The compliance portion of the certificate of compliance need not be completed if the sale or transfer involves the following circumstances:
i. The affected tract of land is without buildings or contains no dwellings or other buildings with indoor plumbing fixtures.
ii. The transfer does not require the filing of a Certificate of Real Estate Value as described in Minnesota Statutes §272.115, Subd. 1.
iii. The transfer is a tax forfeiture.
iv. The sale or transfer completes a contract for deed or purchase agreement entered into prior to the effective date of this Ordinance. This subsection applies only to the original vendor and vendee on such a contract.
C. All property conveyances subject to this Ordinance occurring during the period between November 15th and April 15th, when SSTS compliance cannot be determined due to frozen soil conditions, shall require a winter agreement, which includes an application for an SSTS permit and an agreement to complete a compliance inspection by the following June 1st by a licensed inspection business. If upon inspection the SSTS is found to be in compliance, the permit fee will be refunded. If upon inspection the system is found to be non-compliant, an escrow agreement must be established in accordance with Section 8.01.04A(iv) above, and the system upgraded.
D. The responsibility for filing the completed compliance portion of the certificate of compliance under 8.01.04A, above, or for upgrading a system found to be non-compliant shall be determined by the buyer and seller.

Buyer and seller shall provide the Board or inspector with a signed statement indicating responsibility for completing the compliance portion of the Certification and for upgrading a system found to be non-conforming.
E. Neither the issuance of permits, certificates of compliance, or notices of noncompliance as requested or issued shall be construed to represent a guarantee or warranty of the system’s operation or effectiveness. Such certificates signify that the system in question is or has been designed and installed in compliance or non-compliance with the provisions of these standards and regulations.

ARTICLE 9 ENFORCEMENT
9.01 Violations

9.01.01 Cause to Issue a Notice of Violation
Any person, firm, agent, or corporation who violates any of the provisions of this Ordinance, or who fails, neglects, or refuses to comply with the provisions of this Ordinance, including violations of conditions and safeguards, or who knowingly makes any material false statement or knowing omission in any document required to be submitted under the provision hereof, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof, shall be punishable as defined by Minnesota State Statutes. Each day that a violation exists shall constitute a separate offense.

9.01.02 Notice of Violation
The Board or its authorized septic inspector shall serve, in person or by mail, a notice of violation to any person determined to be violating provisions of this Ordinance. The notice of violation shall contain:

A. A statement documenting the findings of fact determined through observations, inspections, or investigations;
B. A list of specific violation(s) of this Ordinance;
C. Specific requirements for correction or removal of the specified violation(s); and
D. A mandatory time schedule for correction, removal and compliance with this Ordinance.

9.01.03 Cease and Desist Orders
Cease and desist orders may be issued when the Board has probable cause that an activity regulated by this or any other town ordinance is being or has been conducted without a permit or in violation of a permit. When work has been stopped by a cease and desist order, the work shall not resume until the reason for the work stoppage has been completely satisfied, any administrative fees paid, and the cease and desist order lifted.

9.02 Prosecution
In the event of a violation or threatened violation of this Ordinance, the Township may, in addition to other remedies, initiate appropriate civil action or proceedings to prevent, prosecute, restrain, correct or abate such violations or threatened violations and the Township Attorney shall have authority to commence such civil action. The Board and the Township Attorney may take such actions as may be necessary to enforce the provisions of this Ordinance.

9.03 Cost and Reimbursements
If the Board is required to remove or abate an imminent threat to public health or safety, the Board may recover all costs incurred in removal or abatement in a civil action, including legal fees; at the discretion of the Town Board, the cost of an enforcement action under this Ordinance may be assessed and charged against the real property on which the public health nuisance was located. The County Auditor shall extend the cost of as assessed and charged on the tax roll against said real property.

9.04 State Notification of Violation
In accordance with state law, the Board or its authorized septic inspector shall notify the MPCA of any inspection, installation, design, construction, alteration or repair of an SSTS by a licensed/certified person or any septage removal by a licensed pumper that is performed in violation of the provisions of this Ordinance.

ARTICLE 10 RECORD KEEPING
The Township and its licensed inspector shall maintain a current record of all permitted systems, and copies shall be provided to Pine County. The record shall contain all permit applications, issued permits, fees assessed, variance requests, certificates of compliance, notices of noncompliance, enforcement proceedings, site evaluation reports, design reports, record drawings, management plans, maintenance reports, an annual list of all sewage tanks installed in the county sorted by licensed installation businesses, and other records relevant to each system.

ARTICLE 11 DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROCEDURES

A. In the event of a dispute between two designers on whether the soil or design meets the minimum requirements of the ordinance the Township’s licensed inspector shall review the site, upon request, and make the final determination.

B. In the event that a designer and the Township inspector have a dispute related to the design or soils meeting the minimum requirements of the ordinance the Board or its licensed inspector shall meet with the designer on-site to review the soils and design. If the dispute is unresolved the Township inspector and the designer shall request a mutually agreeable soil scientist to review the site. The applicant shall provide a deposit in an amount to be determined by the Township to cover the cost of the soil scientist and Township review. Both parties shall agree in writing that the soil scientist findings shall be final. If the scientist determines the Township inspector correctly interpreted the soils, the deposit will be retained and used to pay the scientist and Township, with any extra money refunded to the applicant. If the soil scientist determines the designer was correct, the deposit shall be refunded and the Township will pay for the cost of the soil scientist review. If soils are reviewed with the soil scientist that was not previously reviewed by the Township the Township shall retain the deposit. All reviews with the soil scientist shall be conducted in a pit that is a minimum of 4 feet by 4 feet with a depth of at least 3 feet below the bottom of the proposed system or until bedrock or the water table, whichever is less.

ARTICLE 12 ANNUAL REPORT
The township shall provide an annual report of SSTS permitting activities to MPCA no later than February 1 for the previous calendar year.

ARTICLE 13 FEES
From time to time, the Town Board shall establish fees for activities undertaken by the Board pursuant to this Ordinance. Fees shall be due and payable at a time and in a manner to be determined by the Board.

ARTICLE 14 INTERPRETATION
In their interpretation and application, the provisions of this Ordinance shall be held to be minimum requirements and shall be liberally construed in favor of the Township and shall not be deemed a limitation or repeal of any other powers granted by Minnesota Statutes.

ARTICLE 15 SEVERABILITY
If any section, clause, provision, or portion of this Ordinance is adjudged unconstitutional or invalid by a court of law, the remainder of this Ordinance shall not be affected and shall remain in full force.

ARTICLE 16 ABROGATION AND GREATER RESTRICTIONS
It is not intended by this Ordinance to repeal, abrogate, or impair any other existing township ordinances, easements, covenants, or deed restrictions. However, where this Ordinance imposes greater restrictions, the provisions of this Ordinance shall prevail. All other ordinances inconsistent with this Ordinance are hereby repealed to the extent of the inconsistency only.

ARTICLE 17 ORDINANCE REPEALED
This Ordinance repeals the Individual Sewage Treatment Systems Ordinance of Wilma Township, adopted July 15, 2003.

ARTICLE 18 ADOPTION
The Wilma Township Subsurface Sewage Treatment Program Ordinance is hereby adopted by the Wilma Township Board of Supervisors on the 4th day of
February, 2015.
____________________________________________
Glen Williamson
Chair, Wilma Township Board of Supervisors

Attest:

____________________________________
Paul Raymond
Clerk, Town of Wilma

Notice of Public Hearing Published:
Public Hearing:
Adopted by Town Board:
Publication of Ordinance:
Filed with County Recorder:
Effective Date: 4/1/2015

Wilma Township Septic Ordinance adapted from Pine County Septic Ordinance and drafted by Paul Raymond, Clerk, Town of Wilma,
52938 Tamarack River Road,
Markville, MN 55072 Pine County’s Septic Ordinance was Drafted By:
Pine County Land Services Department,
1602 State Hwy 23 N, Sandstone, MN 55072

WILMA TOWNSHIP BOARD OF SUPERVISORS’ ROAD INSPECTION, MAY 21, 2014

WILMA TOWNSHIP BOARD OF SUPERVISORS’ ROAD INSPECTION, MAY 21, 2014

Supervisor Mike McCullen called the meeting to order at 10 a.m. at the Duxbury
Store. Also present, Supervisor Gary Vink, Chairman Glen Williamson, Road Manager Mark Pallow, Clerk Paul Raymond, and Danforth Township Supervisor Jason Palme.

CROOKED LAKE ROAD: Jason said a chronic problem is the culverts on Crooked Lake Road freeze in the winter time, causing any melt or runoff to go over the roads. Gary said that is an unavoidable issue when you have water in the culverts at below zero temperatures.
¼ mile down, past Bob’s driveway: Supervisors recommend 1 load gravel. The culvert at this point, right past the ditch repair area, freezes over and the end of the culvert on the west side is not visible. Supervisors agreed that someday this may require a new culvert, and flooding here should be monitored.
Crooked Lake landing: frozen culvert; no action.
One mile, by Jason’s property: County Surveyor cut into road and did not restore it to original condition, at 52979 Crooked Lake Rd. Supervisors recommend 1 load gravel to restore road.
One ½ mile down: More Surveyor damage. Paul can write to highway dept. and notify them of damage and ask if we can be reimbursed, if he has the receipts and documents to show the remedy.
End of Road: Landowner Eric Ternes gated the entrance to Mayfield Road, but did not lock the gate. Loggers (T&T) have left a huge pile of debris, much of it in the Mayfield Road right-of-way. Supervisors said to notify Eric Ternes and T&T to remove the debris, or to deduct the damage from their escrow account. Paul needs the receipts and records to document deductions. We have $1,900 in T&T’s escrow.

ESCROW FUND BALANCES, MAY 2014:
T&T: $1,933.25
Carlson Timber 500.00
Wermerskirchen 500.00
Berthiaume Logging 500.00
Midwest Hardwoods 500.00

EAGLE HEAD ROAD: Tree across road @ 55902 Eagle Head Rd. Culvert at end of the road has water, may need new culvert someday. Supervisors recommend monitoring.

DOLLAR LAKE ROAD: Supervisors recommend load of gravel at end for turnaround.

VINK ROAD: Supervisors recommend two load of gravel at the end of Vink Road, to be deducted from T&T logging, and two loads at the beginning of the road. Mark said T&T did inspect the road with him before their logging activity, but did not inspect it with him afterwards. Supervisors directed Paul to write a form letter of our road policy to send to all loggers, specifying that they need to arrange an inspection meeting with the Wilma Road Manager before logging/hauling activities and also afterwards, or their escrow may be forfeited. Paul needs documentation of when T&T did the logging and receipts and records of gravel and repairs.
Water over road at entrance. The culvert is crushed or collapsed. Glen said we should have a road map showing all our culverts. 1/2 mile up road, after Tim McCullen’s property line, Supervisors recommend one load pit-run and 3 loads of Class 5, to be documented and deducted from T&T’s escrow account. By Smith’s, road needs ditching, on east side of Smith’s driveway, plus one load gravel.
There are concrete barricades and a gate at northwest end of the road. Gary asked Paul to write Greg Beck and tell him that the road is barricaded and that the county will not have access to their land because of the barricades, if they want to sell land west of there. The maps of the proposed sale show an expected easement from the end of Vink Road directly west to the County’s land.

VINK ROAD TOTALS: 8 loads gravel, four in the middle, two at the beginning and two loads at the end. T&T to be charged for 6 loads, township for two. Road Manager is to use his discretion on final gravel and repairs needed.

LANGSTROM ROAD: Eldon Schmedeke joined the road inspection for the range-line roads and for Schmedeke Lane. 2014 is Wilma’s maintenance year for Langstrom Road. Town will put the annual two loads of gravel at the end of Langstrom Road and Pete Anderson Road. Any tree removal will be up to the Erickson’s and Dennis Schmedeke. Duane Glienke is willing to remove trees on right of way, but ownership and disposal of the timber will need to be negotiated between them. Eldon said the board should tell the County that any time they authorize logging on a township road, that they should cut the trees to a full 66′ right-of-way on the roads.

PETE ANDERSON ROAD: Markville has trimmed brush along the road all the way up; road looks very good. Routine blading. Fallen tree in right of way ½ mile up. Culvert at 57891 Pete Anderson Rd. is too high, and is under water. Supervisors recommend one load gravel on both sides of the address sign. At 58502 need 1 load Class 5 gravel to fill a hole in the road at the Brown cabin. There is a culvert at the driveway access into Eldon’s land the town damaged and replaced with a 12-15′ culvert, but Eldon said it should be 30′. Eldon said he put gravel on this culvert.

SCHMEDEKE LANE: Eldon said this road has been an issue for 40 years. He feels he is being asked to pay for land he already owned. He said the extension as built is not according to code, and he feels that the Board is working with Auditor Cathy Clemmer and Commissioner Steve Chaffee without consulting him. Eldon said if he buys the strip of land bordering Schmedeke Lane he wants a clear title with no strings attached, but he wants the road to be built to the full width, 66′. Eldon said that at the entrance to Schmedeke Lane the county culvert is too narrow and no semi truck can enter the road. Eldon said there has never been gravel applied to Schmedeke Lane, but it should have Class 5 gravel applied the whole length. The Board recommends 3 loads of Class 5 gravel to be applied to the existing Schmedeke Lane. Greg Beck and Steve Chaffee will be attending our June 4 Board Meeting, and the Board encouraged Eldon to attend to address the road and land issues directly. He said he’s done talking to the Commissioners. For now, there will be no action taken on building up the Schmedeke Lane Extension until the impasse between the County and Eldon is resolved, and for now, it will remain a County logging road. The County is holding $10,000 for the township for gravel and repairs, pending the resolution. Mike said we could build a pretty good road for that, and then the township would take over ownership of the road.

NORTH DUNCAN ROAD: Board recommends two loads gravel at the beginning of the road. 1.4 mile up road, culvert has collapsed and there is a hole in the road. It needs a 24” 30 foot culvert, and whatever gravel is needed to fill in road, right past 57553 N. Duncan. At 1.6 mile the gravel ends, and Board recommends putting 2 loads of gravel at the end of the graveled part of the road every year.

SOUTH DUNCAN ROAD: 1/2 mile down road, clay has run down the hill where loggers cut into the hill, washing into and filling the ditch and washing out the road. Needs a ditch cut, if Mark can cut it with the grader. Board feels that the County should have the loggers repair the damages when they fill in ditches. Board will bring this up at our June meeting with Greg Beck. Gary said Mike Weidendorf did the damage.
¾ mile down road, S. Duncan is flooded. Ditch is filled in with runoff. Gary said we ditched it but T&T filled it in again. Board recommended Mark re-ditch the road after it is dry, and apply 10 loads gravel on rutted and damaged area.
Toni Williamson came to bring Mike’s truck to pull Mark’s truck out of the mud in the road; Mike moved that she be paid for one hour labor for her time and work. Gary seconded. Glen abstained.

HELLER DRIVE: Board recommends gravel over the culverts; one load on 2nd culvert 1/3 mile in, plus 3 more after. Paul should notify New Dosey to get their approval.

MC CULLEN DRIVE: Routine blading.

MAYFIELD ROAD: Culvert is plugged and water is washing over and eroding the road. The culvert needs to be inspected to see if it’s compromised when the water level drops, and if it’s just plugged, the Fire Dept. can blow out the culvert when the levels drop. The culvert is cut open and needs to be replaced. For now, 1 load pit-run gravel over culvert. Gary said the damage is from Betheume and T&T logging. One mile in, need 30′ 18” culvert, put in deep enough to drain the water. The second culvert in is buried too high and is exposed. The area around it was rip-rapped with stones, but is still eroded. Board recommends more rip-rap by the rocks and one load pit-run to fill it in and one load Class 5 over it. Split one load to fill both holes. Any digging or replacing culvert needs to have a utility locate done before any cutting because there are electric lines buried under the road before the private drive. Total gravel, 2 loads each of pit run and Class 5 for the road.

LITTLE TAMARACK LAKE ROAD: ½ mile in, at curve is under water, at the low spot and the edge of the lake before the cabin’s driveway. Needs one load gravel. Also one load before the boat landing, two loads total.

SHORT ROAD: Routine blading/maintenance.

LOST RIVER ROAD: Routine blading/maintenance. Driveway ditching inspected, that Pat Storey did. Looks adequate.

RIVER CABIN ROAD: Routine blading.

MONA DRIVE: Routine blading.

KENNY PETERSON ROAD: Routine blading.

Glen moved to adjourn meeting; Mike seconded. Meeting adjourned at 5:30 p.m., 7.5 hours.

Paul Raymond, Clerk
attested to by: Glen Williamson, Chairman

WILMA TOWNSHIP BOARD OF SUPERVISORS’ MEETING, MAY 7, 2014

WILMA TOWNSHIP BOARD OF SUPERVISORS’ MEETING, MAY 7, 2014

Chairman Glen Williamson called the meeting to order with the Pledge of Allegiance. Also present were Supervisors Gary Vink and Mike McCullen, Treasurer Patrice Winfield, Clerk Paul Raymond, Road Manager Mark Pallow, and Pat Story and Ben Glocke.
Paul read the record of the April meeting. Gary made one correction; he abstained in the vote on donations to the three public service organizations, not Mike. With that correction, he moved to approve; Glen seconded.

OLD BUSINESS: Schmedeke Lane Extension: Eldon was not at the meeting, so we do not know if or when he will be settling with the county for the land adjoining Schmedeke Lane. Glen asked Paul to write Eldon and tell him the County is waiting for a response from him before they will release the $10,000 to upgrade the Schmedeke Lane extension. Mark said there are land for sale signs at the road.

Wilma Resolution on Land Sales: All Commissioners received our response to the Auditor’s request to rescind our resolution, plus copies of the original resolution. Commissioner Steve Chaffee and Greg Beck will be attending our June board meeting.

Spring Short Course Report: Glen and Paul attended, and said it was one of the best short courses. The legislative update addressed bills and pending legislation affecting townships and MAT: Broadband for rural areas reduced from $100 million to $25 million; Fire fighter credit on state taxes, $500 per firefighter. Using websites for notices, bypassing newspapers.
Clerks/Treasurers: Need to register new hires, like Ben Glocke. @ MN New Hire. Applies to contractors also.
Insurance info for board members: discounts on home and auto, and big discounts on Rx’s: free to sign up: Met Life (medvana.com/metlife). MBA members can get auto and home discounts. Also vision insurance. July township aid: will get two checks in July. Record in Local Govt. Aid.Temporary account, #33401. In Oct. we’ll get our market value credit, PILT. We can keep the old CTAS when the new one comes out and install the new version. Road operators need calendars to keep track of roads and hours and what maintenance done. Meetings can be closed for personnel issues and contracts/bids, (and lawsuits if attorney present). Can close to discuss allegations of a person subject to board authority. Clerks are not subject to the Board, only to the voters. Closed meetings must be recorded. Law or statute authorizing closed meetings must be cited. Closed meetings always start as posted open meetings. They brought back reports and Power Points for the other Supervisors and Treasurer.

NEW BUSINESS: Spring Road Inspection: The Board set Wednesday, May 21, for the road inspection, starting at the store at 10 a.m. Mark said that Mayfield Road is washed out pretty badly and needs some immediate gravel and repair. Gary agreed. Glen moved to authorize Mark to order whatever gravel needed from Hopkins, or whatever they are allowed to haul with the current road restrictions. Mike seconded.

Duxbury Volunteer Fire Department Pancake Breakfast: Will be Sunday, May 25. Gary moved that they be allowed to use the Wilma Town Hall; Glen seconded.

Summer Short Course Registration: Deadline June 11 to pre-register for the Carlton short course on June 26. We aren’t sure who will be attending, so we can register at the June board meeting. $50 per officer if pre-registered.

Filing Notice for State and County Offices: The filing period is May 20 to June 3, 2014, for judges, sheriff, and other state and county offices.

Damage at Two Creeks: While Mark was plowing Two Creeks Campground in February he had to avoid a dumpster and accidentally damaged one of the underground storm shelters. The shelter cannot be repaired, and Glen requested the board to submit a claim to our insurance company for replacement, $4600. Gary said our policy as posted is “Wilma Township is not liable for inadvertent damages while plowing private drives.” Mike said he is concerned that the MAT insurance will tell us we can’t plow private drives any more. Glen said the law is clear that this is permitted, although private driveway grading is not allowed. The board directed Paul to send the claim to the MAT attorneys along with our policy notice, and find out if we can still make an insurance claim. Glen said he does not have property damage insurance for that part of the campground, so can’t file a personal claim. Mike said the board can inspect the damage at the Road Inspection meeting on May 21.

Legal Seminar: Couri/Ruppe Attorneys are holding a free legal seminar for township officers in Rutledge on September 27, from 9 to 4 p.m. We can car-pool. They cover road and liability and all township issues, and give free legal advice.

MAT District Meeting: Will be held on Wednesday, Sept. 3, at Anoka Ramsey College, Cambridge. Register 7 p.m., election 8 p.m. District Director Don Sherper is retiring and has asked Glen to replace him. Glen asked the board to send him and someone to nominate him. There is no tuition. Glen needs to file from June 5 to July 5 for Director. If he is elected, Glen will then be paid by MAT for all meetings and mileage, e.g. County Twp. Officers, Short Courses, District Meetings, State Conventions, which will save the township a lot of money.

Damage on Lost River Road: Pat Storey said that the driveway that blocked Lost River Road flooded, and he fixed it himself. He asked if the township had addressed this issue. Last fall, Pat Storey said someone had filled in the ditch at the cul-de-sac on Lost River Road to create a driveway, and the board said they would try to find out who was responsible. Paul wrote to Leighton Quinn, the project developer who implicated property owner Tom Foster and said: “I talked to Pat Story yesterday when I was up mowing and he did not mention it. Not sure Tom Foster will respond and/or correct the dip if it really is a problem. Personally I have never seen it cause a problem, but I am not up there all the time.” The September 11, 2013 meeting record notes: “Someone filled in the drainage ditch to create a parcel access driveway without putting in a culvert to drain the water, on the west side of Lost River Road just before the cul-de-sac, which created a flooding situation over the road. Mark will inspect this Friday when he checks on the tree locate, and then Paul can contact Mr. Quinn to see if he is aware of this and asking him to have it corrected. We will charge the offender for the gravel and grading needed to repair the road, and if the offender doesn’t put in a culvert, we will at their expense.” Since Pat already repaired the damage, the board did not take action, but they will inspect this more closely at the May 21 road inspection.
Pat had another issue with snowplowing in the recent heavy snowfalls. He said Lost River Road was not plowed out on April 4 or on April 15. Mark checked his records and said he did plow on April 4. But on April 15, the tire fell off the grader, and he was not able to get to Lost River Road, so Pat plowed it himself. He said he did call Mike McCullen, who had assured him the Lost River Road would be plowed. Mike was not aware of the grader issue. Pat asked to be reimbursed for his time, $120. Glen moved to approve; Mike seconded. Mike said this is an extraordinary situation and will not set a precedent; the township cannot allow private parties to plow or grade or do any work on township roads, because we have had so much damage done by well-meaning private citizens. Pat was given Mark’s number, and was told to call the Chairman and Mark if something like this happens again. Pat said he watched the people who lived at the end of River Cabin Road grade the cul-de-sac there and ruin it. The board will inspect this at the road inspection.
Pat said as far as the house at the DNR Eagle Head Station, it looks like MN DOT is going to tear it down; they’ve already started removing lights and fixtures. Tim Faust has not had any influence on their decisions. MN DOT has also said they reserve the right to park their vehicles in the pole barn if necessary; Pat told them that we can’t put our trucks outside whenever they want to use the property.

Langstrom Road Right-of-way: Dennis Schmedeke talked with Duane Glienke about cutting the trees in the right-of-way on Langstrom Road. Dennis wants to be paid for the timber. In 2010 Wilma told Arna Township that we only claim ¼ mile of Langstrom Lane, and we are not responsible for tree removal after that. The L & E Ericson Family Ltd. Partnership told us that they would take care of the trees on the east side of the road sometime in 2011. Gary said if Duane wants to cut the trees and pay Dennis, that’s between them.

Treasurer’s report and bills: Patrice gave the Treasurer’s report (attached) and claims were presented:

Glen Williamson $ 259.04
Patrice Winfield 90.50
Mike McCullen 92.35
Mark Pallow 265.96
Paul Raymond 341.69
Gary Vink 139.45
Seven Co. Senior Federation 100.00
Patrice (expenses) 10.00
MATAT Insurance 1,606.00
OSAC 100.00
Pine Co. Historical Society 100.00
Security Life (Dental) 443.52
ECE 53.87
The Evergreen 22.50
Pine Co. Courier 16.02
Federated Propane 10.68
Gen (expenses) 71.68
Aspire Inc. (website) 300.00
Paul (expenses) 15.93
MAT Short Course tuition 100.00
RDO Equipment 139.81

Total Bills $ 4,279.00

Gary moved to approve the Treasurer’s report and to pay all the claims, and to transfer $4,300 from savings into checking. Mike seconded. Mike moved to adjourn the meeting; Gary seconded. Meeting adjourned at 9:30 p.m.

Paul Raymond, Clerk

attest: Glen Williamson, Chair

NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING, July 15, 2014

 NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING

 Notice is hereby given that the Board of County Commissioners, Pine County, Minnesota will meet at 10:00 a.m., or as soon thereafter as practicable, on July 15, 2014 at the Pine County Courthouse, 635 Northridge Dr NW, Pine City, Minnesota, to conduct a public meeting to discuss and obtain public comment with regard to Wilma Township’s disapproval of the sale of County Tax-Forfeited Non-Conservation Lands.  This notice is given pursuant to M.S. 282.01.

Cathy J. Clemmer

Pine County Auditor-Treasurer